The Texas Ratio is a measure of a
bank's credit problems. The higher the Texas ratio, the more severe
the bank's credit troubles. The Texas Ratio was developed by Gerald
Cassidy and other analysts at RBC Capital Markets as an early warning
system to identify potential problem banks. According to
Investopedia.com, it was originally applied to banks in Texas in the
1980s. Mr. Cassidy noticed that when problem assets grew to more than
100% of capital, most of the Texas banks in that precarious position
ended up going under. A similar pattern occurred in the New England
banking sector during the recession of the early 1990s.
The Texas Ratio is calculated by
dividing the bank's distressed assets (Non-performing Loans +
Acquired Real Estate, plus Deferred Charges such as unbooked losses)
by the sum of its tangible common equity capital and allowances for
impairment and credit losses.
Tangible common equity is the subset of
shareholders' equity that strips out preferred shares or other forms
of hybrid equity capital as well as goodwill or other intangible
assets. It measures a company's financial strength because it
indicates how much equity the common stockholders would have left in
the event of a company's liquidation. A bank's tangible common equity
plus its allowances for impairment and credit losses indicates the
size of the bank's capital cushion, or its ability to absorb losses.
Banks tended to fail when their Texas Ratio reached 1:1; or 100% of
the bank's capital cushion.
The following table indicates the Texas
Ratio for selected Philippine banks using the figures indicated in
their audited financial statements as of December 31, 2010. The
exceptions to this are Asiatrust Development Bank, whose last
published audited financial statement was as of June 30, 2009, and
Bank of Commerce, Land Bank of the Philippines, and Philippine
Veterans Bank, whose last published audited financial statements were
as of December 31, 2009.
Bank
|
Texas
Ratio
|
Philippine Bank of Communications
|
14.99
|
Export and Industry Bank
|
8.84
|
United Coconut Planters Bank
|
5.53
|
Planters Development Bank
|
2.98
|
Asiatrust Development Bank
|
2.51
|
Bank of Commerce
|
1.13
|
Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
|
1.09
|
Philippine Veterans Bank
|
1.01
|
Philippine National Bank
|
0.70
|
Union Bank of the Philippines
|
0.70
|
Security Bank Corporation
|
0.69
|
Allied Banking Corporation
|
0.65
|
Asia United Bank
|
0.63
|
Rural Bank of Makati
|
0.58
|
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company
|
0.54
|
BDO Unibank, Inc.
|
0.44
|
Development Bank of the Philippines
|
0.39
|
Bank of the Philippine Islands
|
0.36
|
Land Bank of the Philippines
|
0.34
|
Philippine Trust Company
|
0.34
|
Philippine Savings Bank
|
0.23
|
China Banking Corporation
|
0.20
|
Citystate Savings Bank
|
0.09
|
As indicated in the table above, eight
banks have a Texas Ratio greater than 1:1. Of these, five banks have
Texas Ratios greater than 2:1. The top three banks on the above list
have Texas Ratios greater than 5:1, which indicates extremely severe
credit problems at these banks.
Recent Developments
Bank of Commerce:
In May 2009, San Miguel Corporation's
property arm and retirement fund have acquired a 51% stake in Bank of
Commerce with an additional equity infusion of PHP 2 billion. As of
December 31, 2010, Bank of Commerce's Capital Funds was increased to
PHP 12.5 billion from PHP 6.7 billion in year-end 2009.
Export and Industry Bank (EIB):
On July 30, 2010, the board of Export
and Industry Bank (EIB)approved the sale of all EIB's bank assets to
Banco De Oro Unibank, Inc. As of April 13, 2011, PDIC gave its
approval for the transaction.
Philippine Bank of Communications:
On July 27, 2011, the group of Roberto
Ongpin acquired a 97.28% stake in Philippine Bank of Communications
from the Chung, Luy, and Nubla families for PHP 4.68 billion.
Disclaimer:
This list only serves as a screening
guide. It is not a definitive guide and must be taken in the context
of other factors. Readers are suggested to make their own
investigations and verify the figures presented. Both BSP and PDIC
have their own problem bank screening systems that are much more
sophisticated in scope and design, given that they have more access
to information over the banks they regulate.