Editor's Note: The ratio of Distressed Assets to Total Capital Cushion is a variant of the famous Texas Ratio, which was widely used by US financial regulators to predict bank failure during the US Savings and Loan Crisis in the 1980s and early 1990s. The basic premise is that a bank with Distressed Assets greater than its Capital Cushion is in danger of insolvency because a significant drop in the value of the Distressed Assets will eat into a significant amount of the bank's capital. A bank that has a Distressed Ratio greater than 100% is flagged as borderline insolvent. For a more detailed discussion of this ratio, please visit a previous blog post: The Texas Ratio of Select Philippine Banks
This is a list of the top distressed Universal and Commercial (U/KB) as well as Thrift Banks in the Philippines as of June 30, 2018. It updates a previous blog post: "The Top Distressed Philippine Banks as of March 31, 2018".
To see where your bank stands relative to these banks, please check the previous blog post: "Philippine Banks Improve Slightly in the 2nd Quarter of 2018"
The list of Philippine Banks classified as distressed as of June 30, 2018 are as follows:
- Inter-Asia Development Bank (Distressed Ratio of 361.81%)
- United Coconut Planters Bank (Distressed Ratio of 301.26%)
- Bangko Kabayan Inc (Distressed Ratio of 234.77%)
- Malayan Bank Savings and Mortgage Bank Inc (Distressed Ratio of 166.55%)
- Enterprise Bank Inc (Distressed Ratio of 164.86%)
- Yuanta Savings Bank Philippines (Distressed Ratio of 164.10%)
- RCBC Savings Bank (Distressed Ratio of 131.11%)
- Philippine Business Bank Inc (Distressed Ratio of 131.11%)
- Equicom Savings Bank (Distressed Ratio of 119.88%)
- Bank of China Limited - Manila Branch (Distressed Ratio of 119.56%)
- China Bank Savings Inc (Distressed Ratio of 111.07%)
- Philippine Resources Savings Banking Corporation (Distressed Ratio of 103.59%)
- Bataan Development Bank (Distressed Ratio of 100.62%)
Source: www.bsp.gov.ph
Disclaimer:
This list only serves as a screening guide. It is not a definitive guide and must be taken in the context of other factors. The figures are based on the individual banks' statement of condition as of March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 as published in the BSP website (www.bsp.gov.ph). For this analysis, no attempt was made to go through the audited financial statements of each bank. Readers are suggested to make their own investigations and verify the figures presented. Both BSP and PDIC have their own problem bank screening systems that are much more sophisticated in scope and design, given that they have more access to information over the banks they regulate.
No comments:
Post a Comment